Process integrity / finance architecture / applied AI

Close the Process Integrity Gap in AI-Driven Finance.

I redesign O2C, decisioning and control architectures across borders, so automation improves cash, control and operating leverage — not just throughput.

25+ years architecting Order-to-Cash and Finance operating models across European and Asian delivery environments: a $30M+ transformation portfolio, €3M+ in revenue-recovery solution architecture, 25+ enterprise go-lives, 500+ SLAs governed for 30+ global clients, and 140+ continuous-improvement initiatives. Now extended into local LLMs, agentic workflows and enterprise AI control architecture.

$30M+Transformation portfolio
€3M+Revenue recovery architected
25+Enterprise go-lives
140+CI initiatives
00 / THESIS
The strategic hook

Automation cannot repair a process it does not understand.

Finance transformation fails when workflow speed is mistaken for process integrity. The architecture has to preserve decision quality, controls, explainability and economic intent before AI is allowed to accelerate it — and it has to hold across entities, currencies, tax regimes and jurisdictions, not only inside the entity where it was designed.

THE PROCESS INTEGRITY GAP

Find where value leaks. Redesign the decision system. Then automate.

The work sits between Finance, operations, product and technology: revenue logic, ERP orchestration, control design, AI decisioning and measurable operating outcomes. Automating a broken O2C cycle does not recover cash — it industrialises the leak and removes the manual checks that were quietly containing it.

01input = finance_process
02detect = leakage + friction + control_gap
03model = economic_logic + decision_logic
04design = workflow + data + control
05apply = ERP + automation + local_AI
06prove = cash + efficiency + traceability
07scale = repeatable_architecture
01 / PROFILE
Strategic architect

I build the operating architecture that scale depends on.

I engineer Finance and technology environments that can grow across markets without sacrificing control, cash, decision quality or execution discipline.

STRUCTURAL MANDATE

Remove the failure mode. Do not institutionalise the workaround.

Across 25+ years in O2C, AR and enterprise transformation, I have engineered platform implementations, operating-model redesigns and AI-enabled workflows across FMCG, Banking, Telecom, Pharma and Consumer Goods, in European and Asian delivery environments.

My value is structural: I identify where an operating model will fail under scale, then redesign and fortify the process, data, controls, technology and decision architecture so the failure mode is removed rather than repeatedly absorbed by the business.

ARCHITECTURAL RANGE

Finance domain depth. Product discipline. Applied AI.

I synthesize deep O2C/AR expertise with SaaS product delivery, enterprise platform architecture and hands-on AI engineering. I leverage local LLM inference, context-aware DLP, explainable credit-risk tooling and GenAI workflow design where they strengthen the operating model.

Evidence at scale: $30M+ transformation portfolio, €3M+ in revenue-recovery solutions architected around leakage and process failure, 25+ EU AR platform go-lives, 140+ continuous-improvement initiatives, $100K+ realised savings, and SLA/KPI architecture spanning 500+ SLAs for 30+ global clients.

02 / SYSTEMS
Builder identity

Architecture, not prototypes.

Working systems that test how enterprise Finance and AI can retain control, explainability and ownership at the point where decisions are made.

RSK / FINANCE DECISION ARCHITECTURE

Explainable credit risk. Kept close to the enterprise.

A self-hosted, API-first credit-risk and AR platform with invoice-level data, behavioural scoring, automated dunning, payment prediction, 30/60/90-day cash-flow forecasting and a locally running AI assistant.

Strategic why

Credit decisions influence cash, customer treatment and working capital. They cannot become opaque simply because AI entered the workflow. RSK keeps the decision logic reproducible, grounds AI in live finance data and places inference inside an ERP-ready architecture rather than behind an uncontrolled cloud prompt.

8-DIMENSION SCORING LOCAL LLM ERP-READY API CASH FORECASTING
DLP / AI CONTROL ARCHITECTURE

Stop the leak at the paste boundary. Not after it.

S.T.O.P. Sentinel is a local-first clipboard DLP agent that intercepts clipboard mutations in real time, redacts credentials, API tokens, payment instruments and PII before paste, and maintains an encrypted audit trail. Native OS interception in C/Objective-C is combined with a Python policy engine using regex, Luhn validation and Shannon entropy heuristics.

Strategic why

Enterprise AI creates a new disclosure boundary at the point of paste. S.T.O.P. Sentinel moves control to that boundary, preventing sensitive data from leaving the governed environment instead of detecting exposure after it occurs — the difference between a control and an incident report.

83-RULE SYNTHETIC EVAL NATIVE OS INTERCEPTION LOCAL POLICY ENGINE ENCRYPTED AUDIT TRAIL
sLLM / AI OWNERSHIP ARCHITECTURE

Build the model layer you can control.

An end-to-end local LLM training pipeline spanning data curation, tokenisation, transformer training, alignment and inference deployment — designed for custom GPT-style models without mandatory cloud dependency.

Strategic why

Enterprise AI strategy becomes structurally dependent when training data, inference economics and model access all sit outside the organisation's control. A local model path matters where data residency, specialised domain knowledge, economics or explainability justify ownership of the model lifecycle.

DATA CURATION BPE TOKENISATION DPO ALIGNMENT LOCAL INFERENCE
Engineering Lab — additional work in code intelligence, OSINT, vulnerability analysis and developer tooling.
Explore GitHub →
03 / RESEARCH
Research / Insights

The architecture has a point of view.

Applied research across finance integrity, AI control and high-efficiency data infrastructure — turning operating problems into architectures that can be tested, challenged and delivered at enterprise scale.

04 / IMPACT
Operator identity

Value architecture at global scale.

Tools sit below the value proposition. The operating question is what improves: revenue integrity, decision quality, cash visibility, productivity, control or transformation velocity — measured across markets, entities and currencies, not in a single ledger.

Economic impact

$30M+Transformation portfolio governed
€3M+Revenue recovery architected
140+Continuous-improvement initiatives
$100K+Realised operating savings

Global delivery footprint

EU+NA+MEA+ LATAM+APAC Cross-border delivery regions
30+Global clients governed
500+SLAs architected
25+Enterprise go-lives

Recovery figures reflect solution value architected against identified revenue leakage, not realised cash collected. Portfolio figures reflect programme scope under governance.

Scroll the matrix horizontally on smaller screens →

Value architecture
Failure mode addressed
Architectural capability
Evidence
Revenue Integrity
Leakage, disputes, collection friction and uncertain cash conversion.
O2C operating models, AR automation, recovery logic, predictive risk and decision controls.
€3M+ recovery architected
Cross-Border ERP Orchestration
Finance workflows fragmenting across systems, regions, currencies and data boundaries.
SAP, Oracle and Workday integration; ERP connectors; multi-country migration and finance-process design.
25+ enterprise go-lives
Intelligent Automation
Manual work that consumes capacity without improving decision quality.
RPA, workflow redesign, agentic patterns, AI decisioning and exception-focused operations.
140+ CI initiatives
Operating Leverage
Cost and productivity drag across finance-service delivery.
SaaS implementation, process redesign, performance architecture and automation.
10–15% FTE reduction per SaaS implementation
AI Control Architecture
Data leakage, opaque inference and unmanaged AI boundaries.
Local LLMs, endpoint DLP, policy enforcement, grounded inference and explainability.
RSK + DLP + sLLM builds
Transformation Governance
Complex execution across executive stakeholders, teams, vendors and countries.
Programme architecture, risk and compliance, executive reporting and multi-country delivery.
$30M+ portfolio · 500+ SLAs
05 / LEGACY
Engagement log

Institutional proof. Condensed to outcomes.

Twenty-five years of Finance and O2C transformation compressed into the economic or operating result that mattered.

06 / METHOD
Architecture principles

The build follows the economics.

A transformation architecture should make the business logic clearer, the control stronger and the operating model lighter.

P01

Value before tooling.

Start with leakage, cash, working capital, control or productivity. Select technology only after the economic mechanism is explicit.

P02

Explainability before autonomy.

AI can accelerate decisions only when the decision path remains inspectable, governable and recoverable.

P03

Build to test the thesis.

Working software exposes architectural assumptions earlier than presentationware. These systems are a way to pressure-test the operating idea before it reaches production scale.

SB://OPEN_CHANNEL

Bring the finance problem. I’ll start with the architecture.

Open to conversations around Strategic Finance Architecture, Enterprise Value Advisory, AI Governance, Business Process Improvement, O2C transformation and senior transformation leadership.